Sign in
View: Mobile | Desktop
 
FOLLOW US:  Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  RSS
Men Women
Cyprus Internationally
Authors:


 
Chris Mammides

FacebookTwitter
 
Dr. Nasios Orinos
Join Us!!! We are looking for someone to help us cover Cypriot basketball. Please send us an e-mail.
Jeremiah Wilson's Blog
Division A Standings
 1. AEK 0-0 
 2. Apoel 0-0 
 3. Apollon 0-0 
 4. APOP 0-0 
 5. Enosis 0-0 
 6. Etha 0-0 
 7. Keravnos 0-0 
Last:9/20/2017
Division B Standings
Group A
 1. Achilleas K. 14-2 
 2. AEL 14-2 
 3. Achilleas Agrou 12-4 
 4. APOP 10-6 
 5. Omonia 7-9 
 6. Asteras 6-10 
 7. Cypriot U18 5-11 
 8. ENAD 2-14 
 9. Zinonas 2-14 
Group B
 1. Ethniki 10-0 
 2. KTE Agiou N. 8-2 
 3. Enosi Athanasiou 5-5 
 4. Atlantas P. 4-6 
 5. Athlitikos 3-7 
 6. PAOK K. 0-10 
Last:3/20/2017
North League Stage A Standings
 1. Near East Un. 13-2 
 2. Koopspor 12-3 
 3. Mapfree Life 9-6 
 4. Yenicami 9-6 
 5. Magem 8-7 
 6. K. American U. 3-12 
 7. E.Mediterenian 1-14 
 8. Soyer Sport 0-15 
Last:12/13/2015
3 Standings
 1 AEK 0-0 
 2 Balkan 0-0 
 3 Beroe 0-0 
 4 BK Pardubice 0-0 
 5 BM Slam Stal 0-0 
 6 Bnei Hertzeliya 0-0 
 7 Boras 0-0 
 8 CSU Sibiu 0-0 
 9 Demir IBB 0-0 
 10 Dnipro 0-0 
 11 Falco-Vulcano 0-0 
 12 FC Porto 0-0 
 13 Istanbul BBSK 0-0 
 14 Khimik 0-0 
 15 Kormend 0-0 
 16 KR 0-0 
 17 Le Portel 0-0 
 18 Mons-Hainaut 0-0 
 19 Nevezis 0-0 
 20 Oradea 0-0 
 21 Parma 0-0 
 22 Rabotnicki 0-0 
 23 Rilski 0-0 
 24 Rosa 0-0 
 25 Sodertalje 0-0 
 26 Spirou 0-0 
 27 Steaua CSM 0-0 
 28 Szolnok 0-0 
 29 Tartu Ulikool 0-0 
 30 Trabzonspor 0-0 
 31 Wuerzburg 0-0 
Last:9/24/2017
Stats Leaders
Points Per Game
 Baden JAXEN
  Etha
  (190-G-90)
  Avg: 21.9
 1. Jaxen, Etha21.9 
 2. Brezec, AEK17.0 
 3. Abukar, Keravnos15.2 
 4. Ray, Enosis15.1 
 5. Bussey, Apoel14.5 
 6. Blakes, Enosis14.3 
 7. Pittakas, Apollon13.8 
 8. Walker, Etha13.6 
 9. Wright, Apoel13.2 
 10. Burnatowski, Apoel13.1 
Rebounds Per Game
 Terell PARKS
  Keravnos
  (204-C/F-91)
  Avg: 8.5
 1. Parks, Keravnos8.5 
 2. Thomas, Enosis8.3 
 3. Dasic, AEK7.3 
 4. Mobley, Apoel7.2 
 5. Blakes, Enosis6.2 
 6. Wright, Apoel6.1 
 7. Barnes, Etha6.1 
 8. Brezec, AEK6.1 
 9. OBrien, Keravnos5.7 
 10. Burnatowski, Apoel5.7 
Assists Per Game
 Kenny BARKER
  Keravnos
  (191-G-86)
  Avg: 6
 1. Barker, Keravnos6.0 
 2. Thomas, AEK4.9 
 3. Washington, Enosis4.7 
 4. Jaxen, Etha4.1 
 5. Bussey, Apoel4.0 
 6. Ross, Keravnos4.0 
 7. Koronides, Apollon3.8 
 8. Brown, Apoel3.1 
 9. Blakes, Enosis3.1 
 10. Walker, Etha3.0 
Steals Per Game
 Ronald ROSS
  Keravnos
  (188-PG-83)
  Avg: 2.1
 1. Ross, Keravnos2.1 
 2. Washington, Enosis1.9 
 3. Dasic, AEK1.8 
 4. Pittakas, Apollon1.7 
 5. Thomas, AEK1.7 
 6. Blakes, Enosis1.5 
 7. Parks, Keravnos1.4 
 8. Barker, Keravnos1.4 
 9. Burnatowski, Apoel1.3 
 10. Jaxen, Etha1.3 
Blocks Per Game
 Kevin THOMAS
  Enosis
  (203-F-92)
  Avg: 1.1
 1. Thomas, Enosis1.1 
 2. Suleiman, Apollon0.9 
 3. Mobley, Apoel0.9 
 4. Parks, Keravnos0.7 
 5. Ortiz, Etha0.6 
 6. Brezec, AEK0.5 
 7. Burnatowski, Apoel0.5 
 8. OBrien, Keravnos0.5 
 9. Trisokkas, AEK0.4 
 10. Kaskiris, Apoel0.3 

First Round Schedule
Magem  Dec. 20  Soyer Sport
Mapfree Life  Dec. 20  K. American .
Koopspor  Dec. 17  E.Meditereni.
Near East Un.  Dec. 17  Yenicami
Check Full Games/Schedule
Next Round Schedule

Round 2 (Qualifying Round)

BM Slam Sta 57% Sep.28 Bnei Hertzel
Rilski 57% Sep.27 Nevezis
Rabotnicki 57% Sep.27 Parma
Oradea 57% Sep.27 Balkan
Trabzonspor 57% Sep.27 Szolnok
Dnipro 57% Sep.27 Demir IBB
BK Pardubice 57% Sep.27 CSU Sibiu
Mons-Hainaut 57% Sep.26 KR
Kormend 57% Sep.26 Boras
Istanbul BB 57% Sep.26 Wuerzburg
Disagreement about Tendex - Jan 26, 2013


POSTED BY:
DR. NASIOS ORINOS
E-mail Dr. Nasios:
Dr. Nasios's Articles

I have read an article about the importance of Tendex score on calculating statistics and i wish to note my disagreement.

Basketball statistics and the way players are rated is indeed something that has bothered basketball experts over the years and has led to the use of different formulas.

The Tendex rating was developed by Dave Heeran over the course of 30 years as a way to differentiate players by using statistics found in boxscores. The formula has been developed and modified over the years and today countries use different kinds of formulas. The simple formula currently stands as follows:

Tendex Rating=
{[ Points + Rebounds + Assists + Steals + Blocks - Turnovers - Missed Field Goals - Missed Free Throws ] / Minutes}


This formula is based on minutes played.

In my opinion though, the use of this formula and more specifically the use of Tendex Score has many faults and cannot constitute an objective measurement of the performance of a player and this is exaclty why many countries are now using a different formula (index) that does not take into account the minutes played.

In the formula we use in Cyprus, aspects like leadership, ability of a player to mark his opponent effectively, confidence, running the drills and many other characteristics are not calculated. These are important aspects of a game and most of the times aspects like these win games compared to only scoring points or grabbing rebounds. For example, how does this formula measure how well a guard sets his team and runs the drills?

Simply, it does not. Passing the ball has nothing to do with running the drills and be the brain of your team.

A second problem is that players can fall in the trap and look on how to improve their scores, not really playing to win. These players care more on winning awards rather than winning games.

In this content, i strongly believe that this is something that the Cyprus Basketball Federation needs to take into consideration. It needs to reconsider the way players are rated.

Below I am giving examples on how the formula changes based on the minutes played.

EXAMPLE 1

In the 1st example we have 2 players who have the same stats but have had different time in the game. Player 1 who has played for 20 minutes has a Tendex score of (1), whereas player 2 who has played only for 10 minutes has a Tendex score of (2).
So as you can see this formula is very sensitive on time played. Imagine a 3rd player who only played for 7 minutes (which is the minimum or calculating the score), obviously having different stats, for example no turnovers and no missed shots, also finishing with a score of 2.

Is this fair? I think not.

{ (10+5+2+2+3)-0-1-1}/20=1
{ (10+5+2+2+3)-0-1-1}/10=2
{ (6+2+2+2+2)-0-0-0}/7=2

EXAMPLE 2

In the example below I wish to stress the fact that the formula is not so sensitive on points. The 1st player scores 0.9 with 20 minutes played, the 2nd who has the same stats has a double score with 10 minutes less in the game. Now, the 3rd player has 10 minutes in the game, just like the 2nd player, but 4 points less. This drops his score only by 0.4, proving that points do not influence the final score as much as time played.

{ (10+5+2+2+3)-2-1-1}/20=0.9
{ (10+5+2+2+3)-2-1-1}/10=1.8
{ (6+5+2+2+3)-2-1-1}/10=1.4

EXAMPLE 3

In a 3rd example 2 players have the same time in the game but the 2nd has 2 turnovers and missed 2 field goals and 2 free throws compared to only 1 of the 1st player. As you can see this drops his score only by 0.15 which proves once more that the formula is not as sensitive on these aspects as it is on minutes played.

{ (10+5+2+2+3)-1-1-1}/20=0.95
{ (10+5+2+2+3)-2-2-2}/20=0.8

Bottom line

1)Tendex Score is more sensitive on minutes played than it is on other aspects.

2)The less the minutes someone plays, other things constant, the better the Tendex Score. A player who goes deeper into the playoffs, compared to someone who finishes the championship early, or someone who has a small number of minutes in the game, will obviously have a worse Tendex Score because he will have more minutes played, which of course is not fair. Add to that the fact that this player will probably have more turnovers, or will miss more shots and this affects his score even more. It is that simple.

3)The last thing I wish to add is that the statistics should be broken down into regular season and playoffs.

MANY PLAYERS HAVE GOOD REGULAR SEASONS BUT HORRIBLE PLAYOFFS.
If you do not distinguish between regular season and the playoffs you skew their stats upwards which is again wrong
.  




Tyreek Duren
Duren comes back to Petrolina AEK Larnaca, ex Boulogne - 1 day ago
Petrolina AEK Larnaca (Division A) strengthened their roster with addition of 26-year old American point guard Tyreek Duren (183-86kg-91, college: La Salle). It is actually his comeback to Larnaca as he has played here before. Duren played most recently at Boulogne in French ProB. In 17 games he recorded 11.5ppg, 2.8rpg, 5.2apg and 1.6spg last season. He helped them to make it to the cup final. Duren ended the previous (2015-16) season at Petrolina AEK Larnaca where in 10 Division A games...   [read more]

Shane Gibson
AEK roll past APOEL at Zivanario tournament - 1 day ago
AEK - APOEL 97:85 Petrolina AEK claimed the first victory at the Zivanario international friendly tournament. They beat their Cypriot rivals APOEL for 1-1 record. Shane Gibson (188-G-90, college: Sacred Heart) nailed 20 points to lead the winners. AEK recorded a 24:16 lead after the opening quarter. They unloaded 28 points in the second period to ensure an 18-point halftime advantage. APOEL cut the distance at 13-point mark at the final break. They sank 26 points in the fourth stanza bu...   [read more]

Junior
Lomomba
Junior Lomomba joins APOP Paphou - 2 days ago
APOP Paphou (Division A) agreed terms with 24-year old Canadian guard Junior Lomomba (196-93kg-93). He just graduated from W.Kentucky (NCAA). In 32 games he had 6.1ppg, 2.3rpg and 3.4apg last season. As mentioned above Lomomba is just out of the college and it will be his first season as a pro. The list of the past achievements is quite long as among others his team made it to the Big East Tournament Semifinals for two years in a row (2015 and 2016). Lomomba represented Canada at the Worl...   [read more]


1 | 2 | 3 | 4
1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Articles
Interviews
Site Map:
Eurobasket.com Member Services: Other Basketball Sites:
Copyright (c) 1998-2017 Eurobasket Inc. Disclaimer

WARNING:
Do not copy, redistribute, publish or otherwise exploit information that you download from the site !
Do not encumber, license, modify, publish, sell, transfer or transmit, or in any way exploit, any of the content of the site, nor will you attempt to do so.